Rural areas should pull own weight
If you're a city dweller in JoCo,
and you believe everyone should pull his own weight, then you're going to love
this idea from County Commissioner
He wants to raise taxes.
Not yours - theirs.
See, already this is sounding pretty good, right?
You see, Segale wants a tax boost, but not in the cities. He
wants one in the unincorporated areas of
He would like to raise taxes on houses in rural subdivisions
and on little acreages out in the countryside, south of
You know, those lovely farmettes
with the horses and the fishing ponds and those little Ford tractors out
back.
Exactly. The folks we all envy for
their lifestyle and for their lower property taxes.
According to Segale, rural
Police protection and road maintenance out in the
unincorporated areas are subsidized.
By whom?
By city dwellers.
It has been that way for years, and it will stay that way
until those areas are annexed by some city.
That is, unless Segale's proposal
gets the serious consideration that it deserves, but is not getting, from other
commissioners.
"I think that it's fair," Segale told me, while
acknowledging he is taking no political risk. The
"It was something I promised to work on during my
campaign," Segale said, "and I'm not giving up."
Why is it fair to raise taxes on some but not others?
Segale explained it this way:
All county property owners pay for and receive benefits from
the county parks and the social service network and the jail and so on. Yet
only in the unincorporated areas does the county maintain roads and provide
regular sheriff patrol (except under contract with some cities).
The cost is $13 million a year. And every county taxpayer
foots that bill, not just the 15,000 who live in the country.
Meantime, 96 percent of the
http://infoweb.newsbank.com.ezproxy.jocolibrary.org/iw-search/we/InfoWeb
5/4/2008
Multi-Print Viewer
Page 2 of 2
their streets or pay their police officers'
salaries.
"It's not my intention to divide the community against
itself," Segale said..
But rural taxpayers shouldn't get a free ride, he said.
At Segale's request, county
staffers pulled some numbers. A tax increase of $50 on every $1,000 of a
property's assessed value in the unincorporated areas would be needed to
collect that $13 million.
That's a huge amount. So Segale proposed a special rural
levy of less than half that.
It would equal the average tax levy in
Sounds fair to me.
But so far, we've yet to hear from the unincorporated areas,
except through statements made by the three county commissioners who have rural
constituents.
As you can imagine, they're not happy with Segale's proposal.
But the newest commissioner has good reason to push on.
A majority of the seven-member commission have no rural
constituents. And, as Segale reminded me, he has been on the job a mere five
months.
"I've got four years to try to make this happen,"
he said.
To reach Mike Hendricks, call (816) 234-7708 or send e-mail
to
Page: B1 Index Terms: Opinion Record Number: 1671439 Copyright 2005 The Kansas City Star Co.